Witness Describes Leadership at S-21
Today, May 5, 2015, witness Him Huy concluded his testimony in front of the Chamber. He was questioned on the authority structure in the prison, at Division 703 and at Prey Sar and gave more information about the guarding process at the gate of S-21.
Clarifications
All parties were present, with Nuon Chea following the hearing from the holding cell. Mr. Koppe read an excerpt of a book by Craig Etcheson. The author had written that Him Huy professed his loyalty to the new government and was given a lenient sentence of one year of labor.[1] Judge Claudia Fenz asked whether Etcheson had indicated any source. After a brief discussion with the bench, Mr. Koppe said that Etcheson had pointed to an interview with Him Huy.
Mr. Huy said he could not recall. “I did not know anything about that.” Judge Lavergne interjected and stated that Etcheson referred to You Huy. Mr. Koppe explained that Etcheson had referred to “the chief of guards”, and that there was no other Huy who was a guard at S-21. Judge Lavergne said that Mr. Koppe had referred to “Him Huy” as being the source of this interview, which was not correct. Mr. Koppe said the footnote referred to You Huy alias Him.
The witness confirmed having heard about him, but he did not know whether he was sent to Prey Sar before or after Sao Phim’s arrest. When the Vietnamese entered the country, he was in the rice fields to the south of Choeung Ek. Mr. Koppe inquired whether this meant that Duch was incorrect in saying that he worked at S-21 “until the last minute.” Mr. Huy replied that he was ordered to work on the rice fields a few days after Duch had accused him of rebelling. This was in mid-1978 – he was assigned to build dykes and clear the forest.
Mr. Koppe inquired whether he knew if there was a clash between members of Division 703 and Duch’s men in S-21. Mr. Huy recounted that Ta Hor told his group that he argued with Duch three times.
“From that time, I kept quiet, I did not argue with Ta Duch”.
From that day onward, they planned to arrest members of Huy’s group. Hor told them not to argue with his men, since they would be subject to arrest otherwise. There were around ten people working at Prey Sar. Only Phal survived, and the rest were arrested and killed. Mr. Koppe confronted the witness:
“But you survived, too, didn’t you”.
Mr. Huy said that Ta Hor and his group, including Mr. Huy, were to be arrested and killed. The “group of Teng” were not arrested.
General questions about Division 703 and Regiment 21
The witness did not know how many combatants there were in total in Regiment 21. Mr. Koppe referred to a document, which said that there were around two thousand men who worked for Regiment 21.[2] Mr. Huy said that he could still not remember. Mr. Koppe asked whether he knew who Comrade Sem was, which the witness denied. Nor did he know who the commander was of Regiment 21 was in early 1976. He knew that Ta Pin and someone else were the commanders of Division 703 in early 1976. Mr. Koppe asked whether he had ever heard that Division 703 was roughly three times bigger than S-21, but the witness had not heard about this. He did not know more about the hierarchy within Division 703. However, Hor was lower in rank than Pin and Nat. Senior Assistant Prosecutor Travis Farr interjected and said that precision in the period of time Mr. Koppe was referring to would be helpful. Mr. Koppe said that he was referring to 1976 until March 1977. Mr. Huy said that Hor was at the regimental level.
Mr. Farr interjected and said that it was not established that S-21 was part of Regiment 21: it had only been said that they “lent soldiers”. Mr. Koppe said that the Rice Consumption Plan gave an overview over all divisions.[3] Another document of March 1976 said that S-21 had 2,327, “not including the components”.[4] Mr. Koppe asked how many combatants (guards, interrogators and the like) worked in S-21 and its surrounding parameters. Mr. Huy answered that there were around 300 soldiers. Mr. Koppe presented a document to the witness that was attached to the S-21 circular.[5]
Special Rooms and Special Guard Force
Mr. Koppe said that the document indicated that there were 127 inside guard and 42 persons inside the “Special Rooms”. The witness did not recognize the handwriting on the document. He did not know how many “inside guards” there were, since these were under the supervision of Peng. He was not part of the guards in the Special Rooms either. He said that the number mentioned in the document related to Mr. Huy’s group was wrong, since it was more than ten, and not eight as indicated in the document. Mr. Huy recalled that the group of “arresters” consisted of more than ten members and that Mr. Huy was the group chief of these. Mr. Koppe wanted to know whether Teng was part of the group in the Special Rooms, which the witness denied: “Teng was at Choeung Ek.” He was an inside guard formerly.
When Mr. Koppe referred to an excerpt of Duch’s testimony in Case 001, [6] Mr. Farr interjected and said that they seemed to be embarking on a new topic. If that was the case, open questions should be asked first. Judge Fenz said that the interjection seemed “a bit premature”, since they did not know which part of the testimony Mr. Koppe would be referring to yet. Mr. Koppe read the excerpt, in which he had said that the Special Guards had to guard outside the premises, receive prisoners and deliver them to “House R”, which was outside the current Beehive Radio Station. Mr. Koppe wanted to know whether this was correct. The witness denied this and said that his group stood guard there. Upon arrival at a small house, “they were pushed inside” and then walked outside. The vehicles were not allowed to go inside the compound. Mr. Koppe asked whether it was correct that once Mr. Huy had handed over the prisoners to Peng, he “could rest”, which the witness confirmed.
Mr. Koppe said that this document indicated that the tasks of the Special Force were to
- Receive prisoners
- Register the prisoners
- Intervention – defend the prison from inside
- Defend the compound if there was an intervention from outside
- Arrest people when this had already been decided by superiors, such as the arrest of Koy Thuon as ordered by Hor.
Moreover, the guards stationed at Choeung Ek were part of the special force. Mr. Koppe inquired whether this description of the tasks of the Special Force was correct. Mr. Huy answered that it was not correct. Members from the inside, together with members from Mr. Huy’s group, “joined forces and addressed the issue”. Mr. Huy also went. They needed the “big-built” guards from the inside, since his group only had one “big-built” person”.
Arrest of Koy Thuon
Six or seven people from Mr. Huy’s group arrested Koy Thuon. Mr. Koppe wanted to know why they needed the big-built persons to arrest Koy Thuon, since Koy Thuon had been under house arrest already. Mr. Huy said that these were the rules. Judge Fenz sought clarification for the witness’s statement that “this was the rule”, but was unsuccessful in doing so.
Mr. Koppe then presented a photograph to the witness.[7] The photograph showed a prisoner in a cell at S-21. Mr. Huy said that this was Koy Thuon. Peng arrested him and Mr. Huy “simply acted as guard”. The building was to the south.
Mr. Koppe asked whether the fence was made of zinc. The witness replied that it was surrounded by barbed wire. He only knew the entrance to the main building and the building where “important prisoners were detained”. Each building in the south was surrounded by barbed wire. Hor and Duch had the authority to enter the special premises of the prison. Mr. Huy was occasionally allowed to enter the premise when he was allowed to walk along the path of the building and the veranda. Three groups were allowed to enter the special premise. Mr. Koppe asked whether he could give an estimate of the maximum of cadres were allowed to enter the parameters of the Special Prison, which the witness did not know. Mr. Huy did not know about a specific number of houses, but could only remember one of the special prison.
The special prison would be detained on the left when entering the compound.
At this point, the President adjourned the hearing for a break.
Imprisonment of Koy Thuon
After the break, the floor was then granted to the Nuon Chea Defense Team. Mr. Koppe said that there was a building on the south side of the prison referred to Building A. The Special Prison, however, was south to the premise of the prison. Mr. Farr interjected and said this was not clear. Mr. Koppe referred to a document on the case file to support his argument.[8] Mr. Huy did not know where specifically Koy Thuon was detained. Building A was made a “special prison” at some point. Mr. Koppe pressed on and wanted to know whether Koy Thuon was held to the south of Tuol Sleng outside of the premise. He replied that houses outside of the premise were also Special Prisons before Building A was made a special prison. He did not know which house Koy Thuon was held, or whether Koy Thuon was held at Building A. The “special houses” were under the supervision of Sry. Mr. Koppe asked whether he had seen anyone in these special houses, such as Ya or Chan Chakrei, which the witness denied.
At the time, he was on patrolling duty. Prisoners were kept temporarily at the house that is now the Beehive Radio Station. Following another question, Mr. Huy said the prisoners were driven right into the compound of what is now the Tuol Sleng Museum. The location at what is now the Beehive Radio Station was to prevent vehicles from entering the compound.
Mr. Koppe referred to Mr. Huy’s testimony in Case 001, during which he had said that less important people would be sent to Prey Sar, while others would be sent into the compound.[9] Mr. Koppe wanted to know where this decision was made. He said that there would be a large truck waiting for the prisoners to be transported to Prey Sar. The people who were sent to Prey Sar were not registered nor had their photograph taken. Ta Hor told him who would tell him who would be sent to Prey Sar. There was a list of names which prisoners would be sent to the fields and into the compound.
Mr. Koppe referred to head of photographers Nhim Kim Sreang’s Written Record of Interview, who had said that he photographed prisoners at Prey Sar.[10] Mr. Huy recounted that they did not have to register and photograph the prisoners who were sent to Prey Sar. There was a list of names who was to be sent to Prey Sar and those who would be sent inside the compound.
Mr. Koppe asked whether his group was part of the 100-Men-Unit or separate of it, and whether he had to report to Peng. Mr. Huy answered that Peng and Phal were chief of the security guard group. Sry and the witness were members and the other Huy was one of the commanders. Mr. Huy’s team was under the one of Peng, but he received orders from Hor. Peng was the witness’s superior. He did not know about the reporting system, but usually Peng would report to Hor. Phal would also send reports to Hor. This may have been forwarded to Duch. Ta Hor was higher than Peng and Phal and was in charge of all security guards. Anyone could make a report to Hor without making a report to Peng or Phal. Pouch was one of the chief of the security guards together with Peng. Later, he was arrested and Phal came to replace him.
Mr. Koppe presented a photograph to the witness.[11] The photograph showed 11 men in uniforms, including the witness. He was the one who was carrying a gun in the middle of the front row. He remembered the names of Tey, Kom, Rhon, and Horn. At this time, he had already entered S-21 and Ta Nat was in charge. They were requested to provide protection to Chinese visitors, who visited a site in Kirirom. The men were former 703 members and some messengers. Some men were from Ta Nat’s office. Peng was always the witness’s superior. However, “Peng never gave me an order, and the order came from Ta Hor”. He was part of the outer parameter guards, who were under the direct supervision of Ta Hor.
Mr. Koppe wanted to know when exactly Peng told him that Peng was responsible for executions at the S-21 premises, but Mr. Huy could not recall.
“It was likely that when I entered Thy’s office, he said that he took people to be killed at the back of the office”.
They took people behind the office to be killed, but he did not know the exact location. They only told him that they killed people to the south of the office. Mr. Koppe inquired where and when he received information that Peng was responsible for the killing of children. Mr. Huy answered that children were subsequently gathered to be killed behind the prison when their parents were sent to Choeung Ek. “I saw them being taken away”. He took men and women to a vehicle. He learned from Hor that children were sent to Peng and not Prey Sar. Mr. Koppe asked whether he had seen, with his own eyes, that children were killed at the S-21 premise. Mr. Huy denied this.
“However, everyone said that they were killed behind the prison”.
Mr. Koppe pressed on and asked whether this was a rumor or an actual fact. Mr. Huy said that children had already been sent after parents were sent away. “I received the prisoners […] to have them on the vehicle and the children were sent to another road.” Mr. Huy said that the children were held by their hands or carried to the back of the prison. He saw them at the building. Mr. Huy himself only received adults. The instructions from Ta Hor to Peng were to take away the children first. The President interjected and instructed the witness to answer how he knew about this execution order. The witness repeated that the order was that if parents were taken out, the children had to be taken out to be killed.
Mr. Koppe quoted the witness’s testimony in Case 001, in which he had said that he was not certain about the execution of the children: “I don’t think I have any idea about that”. [12] Mr. Koppe asked what made him say that he knew it now. Mr. Huy answered that the order was to kill the children.
Teng
Mr. Koppe moved on to another topic. He wanted to know what Teng’s position was at S-21. Mr. Huy replied that Teng was a guard of the Special Prison and a group chief at that location. He came to work there, since he was reassigned to another unit. He did not know whether Teng was arrested at some point. Mr. Koppe wanted to know whether Teng was punished “in some sort or the other” and sent to Prey Sar. Mr. Huy said that he did not know about this. He saw him at Choeung Ek when Teng’s group was assigned to transport wood to build the house – this was where he “got to know him”. Mr. Koppe asked whether this meant that he did not know him when Teng was guard at the Special Prison. Mr. Huy replied that he knew him already when he was at the Special Prison. According to the witness, Teng changed positions in 1977. He did not know when exactly. They would have common meals together, but slept in different sleeping quarters. He could not recall whether there was any other Teng at S-21.
At this point, the President adjourned the hearing for a break.
Request by Co-Prosecutors to Admit Further Documents
After the break, the floor was granted to Judge Lavergne to put questions in relation to the Co-Prosecutors’ request to admit some documents. Judge Lavergne said that the documents seemed to come from ongoing investigations. An issue might be that there appeared to be Written Records of Interviews that concerned the current witness and witnesses that had been heard previously in the annexes. Judge Lavergne asked the Co-Prosecutors to clarify.[13] Mr. Farr answered that he was not prepared to give detailed answered and asked to be able to give answers after the break. The floor was granted to the Nuon Chea Defense Team. Mr. Koppe said that it was “extremely unfortunate” that they only received these 45 Written Records of Interviews now, five of which were related to S-21. “I find it actually not acceptable”, since he did not know whether this was new evidence. The only appropriate way to do this was to pause now and then resume. Judge Fenz said that everyone was in the same situation and that the witness might have to be recalled. The Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyers had been in the same situation of not having known the documents. International Civil Party Lead Co-Lawyer Marie Guiraud said that this was not a disclosure, but that it was a Rule 87(4) motion, which meant that they had an E3 number already. Judge Fenz said that the request said that 17 had already been disclosed, which meant that the rest had not. Ms. Guiraud said that the two Written Records of Interviews of Him Huy had already been submitted.
Khieu Samphan Defense Counsel Anta Guissé said that most documents had not been made available previously. Mr. Farr clarified that a number of the evidence was not exculpatory, but that they wanted to disclose information simultaneously.
The floor was granted to the Nuon Chea Defense Counsel again for questioning the witness. Mr. Huy said that Peng and Hor had said that “important people” had to be killed in the vicinity of S-21. He could not recall where Peng and Hor said this. He overheard that important prisoners were to be killed behind the prison, because Angkar did not trust the people who transported the prisoners. He met him at Thy’s office and overheard it when he brought the prisoners to another location. They did not want anyone else to know about the arrest of these prisoners.
As for the executions of children, Mr. Huy said that Peng talked about this.
Thai fishermen
Turning to his next topic, Mr. Koppe inquired whether he had ever seen Thai fishermen, which the witness confirmed. They arrived in vans that stopped close to the compound. Mr. Koppe referred to Mr. Huy’s Case 001 testimony, in which it had said that these Thai prisoners were released later.[14] Mr. Huy replied that they were not allowed onto the compound.
Rape
When Mr. Koppe started to ask about an incident of rape of a female prisoner that the witness had talked about, Ms. Guiraud said that she was under the impression that the witness had talked about Duch. Mr. Koppe said that the transcript said Duch, but that it was “very clear” that he had actually talked about Touch. Mr. Huy clarified that the guard was 13 or 14 years old. He was arrested. A training session was held later about this incident. This young boy was not Duch. He could not remember the name, but that Thy would know about this. He said that it was not Duch. He heard that this person was arrested, but he did not know what happened to him. He had not heard about someone trying to kill himself in this context.
Mr. Koppe referred to Chan’s notebook.[15] Mr. Huy said that it was known that moral offenses should not be committed. He confirmed that this was part of the principles and that they had to adhere to this all the time.
Mr. Koppe read out the sixth principle (do not behave in any way that violates females) and asked whether this was specifically raised.[16] Mr. Huy said that this principle was raised during their meetings. Despite having separate tasks, they had to adhere to their core tasks and supplementary tasks.
Son Sen and CPK leadership
Mr. Koppe then asked about Son Sen’s visit and asked how often he saw him. He replied that he saw Son Sen once at a training session. Mr. Koppe referred to Lach Mean’s testimony, who had said that he saw Son Sen three to four times in 1978.[17] Mr. Koppe inquired whether it was possible that Son Sen came three to four times and not only one time in 1978, which the witness denied. Mr. Huy insisted that Son Sen only came once. However, he did not know whether Son Sen came to visit S-21 after Mr. Huy was sent to Prey Sar. Duch referred mostly to Brother 1 and Brother 2 during the training sessions. The participants wondered who they were and they concluded that they were Pol Pot and Nuon Chea. This was in 1977. Only Duch referred to them as Brother 1 and Brother 2 and he did not hear this from Son Sen. “Son Sen taught us how to protect the location”. He did not know the number Son Sen was referred to. Mr. Koppe asked whether he knew that he was called Brother 89, to which the witness replied that he did not pay attention. He did not know who Brother 3 was. Nor had he heard anyone referring to Ta Nat as Brother 3. Mr. Koppe said Duch had said that Ta Nat was Brother 3 or Sen and asked whether Duch was mistaken. Mr. Farr asked for references. Mr. Koppe withdrew the question after not being able to find the references.
Mr. Koppe then inquired whether he knew anyone else from the Standing Committee, which the witness denied.
Prey Sar
The prisoners who were brought to Prey Sar by driver Brother Srim would be handed to Huy Sre. There were no guards for them, since they were told that they had to work in the rice field. The guards returned after this. The prisoners were told that they were sent to Prey Sar “to be tempered”. Mr. Koppe referred to Mr. Huy’s testimony and inquired where the children and mothers would go at Prey Sar.[18] Mr. Huy answered that they were transported to Prey Sar at a house, where Huy Sre was, and would be allowed to stay in this house. They were ordered to dig canals and dykes with no distinction being made between workers.
Mr. Koppe wanted to know whether he remembered seeing people at Prey Sar who he previously had brought in a truck to go there. They were allowed to have meals and had to work at the dam site later. He said it could be hundreds of people working at Prey Sar, but not up to a thousand. Mr. Koppe gave the references for Ta Nat being Brother 3.[19]
Mr. Huy recounted that one time on the way from Prey Sar to Choeung Ek, the car rolled over on the way to Prey Sar and they returned. They reported this to Hor, who sent the information to Duch. The vehicle was repaired afterwards. Mr. Koppe inquired what happened to the people who were in the car. He replied that the car empty en route when it fell over. Mr. Koppe whether his conclusion was correct that Mr. Huy never sent people from Prey Sar to Choeung Ek. With this, Mr. Koppe finished his line of questioning.
Interrogators
International Khieu Samphan Defense Counsel Anta Guissé asked the leadership at S-21. Mr. Huy said that he was not allowed to speak to other interrogators. He said that the rules were stricter in late 1978, because arrests intensified.
“We were not allowed to play around with one another or have time to relax”.
Ms. Guissé wanted to know how he knew that Duch and Hor were dealing with important prisoners, if he was not allowed to talk to other interrogators. He answered that only Ta Hor and Duch were allowed to enter the compound. Pon also interrogated. Mr. Huy could see the location from his house. Ms. Guissé said that Duch had drawn an interrogation chart at S-21.[20] He had not indicated that Hor was responsible for interrogations, but Pon only. Since Ms. Guissé seemed to open a new subject, the President adjourned the hearing for a break.
Clarifications regarding Co-Prosecutors’ request
After the break, Assistant Prosecutor Andrew Boyle answered the questions raised by Judge Lavergne earlier during the day. Mr. Boyle said that some of the documents had a Case 002 number and had been disclosed already. Those that did not have a Case 002 number are being disclosed at the time. For example, Prak Khan’s Written Record of Interview had a Case 002 number. The same applied to 2-TCW-816’s statement. All relevant witness statements had been disclosed already. There were some documents that had content that were related to S-21. He said that the Co-Prosecutors were obligated to disclose documents by witnesses, exculpatory statements and documents that they had been ordered to disclosed pursuant to a ruling by the Supreme Court Chamber.[21] Asked for further clarification by the President, Mr. Boyle said that the three statements by this current witness had already been disclosed.[22] Mr. Prak Khan’s statement had already been disclosed.[23] Moreover, 2-TCW-816’s statement was disclosed on 26 April 2016.[24] The President asked why this request had not been made earlier. Mr. Boyle explained that they had requested disclosure from the OCIJ. They prioritized their resources for disclosure so that parties would have access to them. Thus, the request to admit them into evidence would come some time after the request to disclose.
Entering the compound
Ms. Guissé said that she did not quite understand the rationality of the request of the Co-Prosecutors. The week granted to prepare for the witness had been further curtailed through this. She then continued her examination. Ms. Guissé said that Prak Khan had described the zinc fence that was covered with barbed wire close to the fire station. He confirmed that there was a fence there. “But as usual, the vehicles would first pass through the gates in the east, and then went into the second fence”. He did not know what happened in the north and west. There was only one entrance where vehicle could enter. Drivers were not allowed to drive the vehicles into the compound. Only Mr. Huy and his guards were allowed to drive the cars into the compound. There were guards who protected the vehicles. Duch had set the authority to set the procedures. Ta Hor asked him and others to install the fence – usually made of zinc – to block vehicles from coming in. Ms. Guissé said that Prak Khan had said that there were no letters for authorizing the entry and that drivers had to be recognized by him.[25] Mr. Huy answered that the drivers from his group replaced the ones who had brought the vehicle in. Some of the vehicles were from the state ministry. The guards from Him Huy would drive the vehicles to the location to drop the prisoners off and then drive the vehicle back outside the compound. He confirmed that other people were not allowed to enter. On one occasion, a vehicle that was not from S-21 entered the compound, because they were not standing guard. Duch blamed them for this and told them not to leave their guarding spot anymore.
Relations to other cadres
Ms. Guissé then inquired whether he had particularly friendly relations with Hor and Peng. He replied that he could communicate with Hor, but not with Peng. He was ordered “to walk Ta Pang”, who said that he had implicated Ta Hor. It was at this time that Ta Hor and Duch had a conflict. After walking Pang into the compound, he talked to Ta Hor about the case. He was concerned that Ta Hor would be arrested first, followed by himself. Asked about Peng, he said that he did not trust Peng, since he was close to Duch.
Ms. Guissé asked why Peng had told him about executions that he participated in, if he did not trust him and the principle of secrecy prevailed. At this point, Mr. Farr objected and said that this led to speculation. The objection was overruled. The witness recounted that the rules were not that strict in 1977. “However, I did not have any daily conversations with him. I was really careful about Peng, since he was close to Duch”. Later, a regulation was imposed that they were prohibited from speaking form one to another and had to monitor combatants. “From that moment, each of us was by ourselves”. They did not dare to speak to each other out of fear of being arrested.
Ms. Guissé asked when he became an interrogator, as he had indicated yesterday, and who appointed him.[26] Mr. Huy answered that this was in 1977, when the interrogator groups were established. He declined this, however, since he said that he did not know how to write and preferred being a guard.
“But in fact, I was afraid of being an interrogator”.
He was then assigned to receive prisoners. Hor asked him to be an interrogator. Thus, he was assigned to stand guard at what is now the Beehive Radio Station.
Turning to the time during which he was implicated in a confession, Ms. Guissé asked who implicated him in a confession and who announced to him that he would be transferred to Prey Sar. He answered that Duch reassigned him to work at the rice fields at Choeung Ek. Duch had arrested Moun, who had implicated Mr. Huy. Duch had asked him in a study session, since Moun implicated him.
“And I said how could I do that?”
Several days later, Duch sent his messenger to relocate weapons from the warehouse to the general staff office. Later, he was assigned to work on the rice field. Ta Hor told him to prepare for the relocation to Prey Sar. “I knew that the instruction came from Ta Duch”, since Ta Duch had known about the intention to rebel.
When he assigned to go to Svay Rieng, the East Zone soldiers also talked to him about the situation. He saw about sixty new Chinese trucks. They prepared those trucks with weapons from Division 703 and were ready to fight the Vietnamese. He knew that this would also spread to the northern part of Svay Rieng.
He did not know how they communicated with Duch when the soldiers were arrested: “Maybe over telephone line”. They were instructed that they had to fight Vietnam. With this, Ms. Guissé finished her line of questioning.
The President thanked the witness and dismissed him. The President adjourned the hearing. It will continue Monday, May 23, 2016, at 9 am with the testimony of 2-TCW-816.
[1] E3/1813, at 00078740 (EN).
[2] E3/1136, 00543743 (EN), 00160081 (KH), 00548764 (FR).
[3] E3/1136, Rice Consumption Plan in 1976.
[4] E3/849.
[5] E3/8386, at 0002640 (KH), 00521634 (EN), 00532736 (FR).
[6] E3/5793, 10:09.
[7] E3/9431, photograph 32, at 00198061 (EN).
[8] D108/7/1
[9] E3/7461, at 10:59.
[10] E3/7639, at 00162736 (EN), 00338079 (FR),00162713 (KH) and 00162734 (EN), 00338076 (FR), 00162710 (KH).
[11] E3/8063.14, at 00005254 (EN).
[12] At 11:47.
[13] E405.1.
[14] E3/7641, at 16:26.
[15] E3/833, at 00077856 (KH), 00184595 (EN).
[16] E3/765, at 003764922-93 (KH), 00540024-25 (FR), 00539994 (EN).
[17] 14:28
[18] E3/7461.
[19] E3/355, at 00242875 (EN),
[20] E3/1570, at 00154214 (FR), 00154198 (EN), 00154229 (KH).
[21] E363/3
[22] E319/40, E319/41.
[23] E319/46
[24] E319/46.
[25] Testimony of Prak Khan, shortly before 10:41
[26] Testimony of Him Huy, April 4, 2016, at 09:26.